[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: udev device naming policy concerns

sean finney <seanius@seanius.net> writes:

> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 11:11:05PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp> writes:
>> > Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
>> > > So I'm all for sticking with maintaining devfs names.
>> > 
>> > And I'm all against it.  (Whee!)
>> Thats makes 1:1. Lets get more people to get a quorum.
> okay, fwiw, i'm against devfs names in as much as i don't think they are
> what should be used by default.  if there's a low or medium priority
> debconf question that gives the option between one and/or the other,
> all the better, but at least by default let's do things like the rest
> of the linux/unix world please :)

Many/most commercial Unixen have had devfs-like systems for years ;-).

Roger Leigh

                Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
                GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.

Reply to: