[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 31 March 2004 03:01 pm, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Sean Harshbarger wrote:
> > It would be nice to have support for optimized
> > binaries. IMHO it would help Debian out a lot.
>
> As far as I recall, the performance gains from compiling everything with
> your-favorite-optimizer-settings aren't _that_ great -- typically smaller
> than what you'd gain by waiting a couple of months before buying your
> computer.
>
> If you have a performance problem, recompiling the pieces that actually
> are too slow is still faster than to wait for your box to compile
> *everything*. For myself, however, I fail to see the point.
>
> (In a previous life, I ran an entire ISP on my own home-brew
> Linux distribution. You might brand me as a masochist, but you can't
> accuse me of not knowing whereof I speak. ;-)
>
> --
> Matthias Urlichs

I've seen some benchmarking on this from a friend of mine and for most apps 
you see a very slight gain, but nothing that makes it a "must have" option, 
especially when you weigh the downside (needing the time to rebuild the app 
locally). The overall gain I noted from his tests suggested about +0.75% gain 
in performance. For me, I'd rather be using my machine for something more 
productive.

- -- 
Gary L. Greene, Jr.
Sent from uriel.gvsu.edu
  3:07pm  up 3 days 13:16,  4 users,  load average: 0.16, 0.11, 0.09
============================================================
Founder and president of the Grand Valley Linux Users Group
 check out http://www.gvlug.org/ for more info.

PHONE : (616) 331-0849
EMAIL : greeneg@arklinux.org (my Ark Linux account)
EMAIL : greeneg@student.gvsu.edu (my student account)
============================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAayZurTQE7CqFxs8RAu3VAJ0VASrYASAwPKToZXfq1kVlT2cOugCeIlCX
zUgZCRb37++iuaoqBk/8Hw8=
=oMMK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: