Re: RFC: kernel packages cleanup
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 05:22:40PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> It's also worth noting that for some unknown reason kernel-image-2.4.21* is
> present in testing (but not unstable) for i386.
The reason is obvious for everyone who knows
Removing as many kernel modules for 2.4 kernels as possible was also
part of my initial proposal.
> kernel-image-2.4.25-1-586tsc -- REMOVE?
> Consider removing entirely -- Pentium Classic optimization not used for 2.6
> kernel packages.
> kernel-image-2.4.24-1-k6 -- REMOVE?
> Consider removing entirely -- k6 optimization not used for 2.6 kernel
No, Herbert has done the right decision to provide the same kernel 2.4
flavours for Debian 3.1 than are in Debian 3.0 and chnging the flavours
in the kernel 2.6 images.
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed