Re: spam closes Debian bugs!
* Hamish Moffatt (firstname.lastname@example.org) [040315 22:55]:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 12:18:58PM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 10:58:21AM +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> > > While I definitely see this as bad(TM), i don't see this as a big
> > > breakdown of our BTS. As long as developers keep an eye at the bugs
> > > reports, and attend theire mail I don't see a major problem in this.
> > Perhaps it's time for cookie auto-replies for emails to BTS.
> Good idea. How about checking a GPG signature if present, else send an
> auto-reply asking for confirmation? katie et al should also be able to
> close bugs without confirmation.
Sorry, but this is also broken. It just makes too much work for the
DDs. Better get tougher crossassassin support, and take maintainers
etc into a whitelist.
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C