[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ITP: openswan



On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 19:28, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> [Please CC me in replies, I am currently not subscribed to -devel.]
> 
> I intend to package openswan as replacement for the discontinued 
> freeswan. openswan should have all patches that are currently in the 
> freeswan package, thus package should be easier. Kernel integration is 
> very similiar, so besides the name, not much should change.
> 
> I will be working on this next week (and also hope to solve the freeswan 
> 2.6 native kernel issues for getting it into testing) and hope to get 
> something ready soon. If anybody wants to give it a try, drop me a line. 
> I could also need some 2.6-testers for freeswan, which is IMHO the 
> better choice for testing/to-be-stable.
> 
> best regards,
> Rene

That's not the correct way to submit an ITP.

Please read http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting

Cheers,
Bruno.
-- 
Midway upon the journey of our life,
I found myself within a forest dark,
For the straightforward pathway had been lost.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: