[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: udev device naming policy concerns

Paul Hampson wrote:

> I think the devfs naming scheme is better personally, as it gives you a
> structured view of what's in the system, and a structured way of dealing
> with devices... (IE v4l stuff lives in /dev/video, easy.)
> On the other hand, I can understand your point about not migrating away
> from the documented, standardised approach, (ugly as it may be :-)...
> The current default files create nodes in the devfs places, and symlink
> to the kernel names for the ide/scsi stuff. Maybe it ought to create
> nodes with the kernel names, and symlink to the devfs-style names?
That would be a rather nice default, actually.  :-)  My vote's for that.

Nathanael Nerode  <neroden at gcc.gnu.org>
US citizens: if you're considering voting for Bush, look at these first:
http://www.misleader.org/  http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/arar/

Reply to: