[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: licensing confusion

Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:49:10PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
>> Of course, there are alternatives to OpenSSL.  It may make the most sense
>> to simply use GNUTLS.  I'm not sure whether there exists an OpenSSL
>> compatible API for GNUTLS,

> % dlocate -L libgnutls10 | grep openssl
> /usr/lib/libgnutls-openssl.so.10.1.4
> /usr/lib/libgnutls-openssl.so.10

> An OpenSSL-compatible wrapper for GNUTLS has been available for years,
> but I do not know how complete it is.

I do not know either, but would like to remark that GnuTLS'
OpenSSL-wrapper is licensed under GPL instead of LGPL like
the main GnuTLS code.
                   cu andreas
NMUs aren't an insult, they're not an attack, and they're
not something to avoid or be ashamed of.
                    Anthony Towns in 2004-02 on debian-devel

Reply to: