[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: udev device naming policy concerns

On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 08:20:53PM +0000, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Andreas Metzler may or may not have written...
> > Tore Anderson <tore@debian.org> wrote:
> > (I am not using it when booting 2.6, as it is obsolete and devfsd has not
> > been updated).

> My impression is that it has, at least, been maintained. I think that it'll
> be retained as long as 2.6 is maintained, but removed completely in 2.7. (Of
> course, ICBW...)

Actually, as reported through kerneltraffic, it apparently hasn't been
updated by anyone for years. Everytime someone asks, insurmountable race
conditions are mentioned and everyone runs for the hills.

Of course, _I_CBW too. :-)

Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE
6th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU
The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)

"No survivors? Then where do the stories come from I wonder?"
-- Capt. Jack Sparrow, "Pirates of the Caribbean"

This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial
use, duplication and distribution.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: