Re: [debian-printing] Packaging of vendor PPD files.

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: Roger Leigh <roger@whinlatter.uklinux.net>, Kenshi Muto <kmuto@debian.org>, Craig Small <csmall@debian.org>, Chris Lawrence <lawrencc@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [debian-printing] Packaging of vendor PPD files.
From: "Per Olofsson" <pelle@dsv.su.se>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:24:22 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040301172422.GF29007@dsv.su.se>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Roger Leigh <roger@whinlatter.uklinux.net>, Kenshi Muto <kmuto@debian.org>, Craig Small <csmall@debian.org>, Chris Lawrence <lawrencc@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <20040301013830.GA18142@enc.com.au>
References: <871xoenf92.fsf@wrynose.whinlatter.uklinux.net> <20040301013830.GA18142@enc.com.au>

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 12:38 +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> Wouldn't they go into a specific foomatic package? HP ijs has something
> similar.

These PPDs don't have anything to do with foomatic, so no. Foomatic
PPDs are generated from its own database.

-- 
Pelle

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [debian-printing] Packaging of vendor PPD files.
  - From: Chris Lawrence <lawrencc@debian.org>
- Re: [debian-printing] Packaging of vendor PPD files.
  - From: "Pedro M." <pmacv@telefonica.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [debian-printing] Packaging of vendor PPD files.
Next by Date: Re: Componentized linux?
Previous by thread: Re: [debian-printing] Packaging of vendor PPD files.
Next by thread: Re: [debian-printing] Packaging of vendor PPD files.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread