Re: *UNAPPROVED* dpkg nmu
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Jarno Elonen wrote:
> > You may have perfectly valid reasons for not being able to work on dpkg
> > at the moment, I'm not contesting that. However these reasons should
> > not stop *anyone else* working on dpkg.
> Indeed. There are actually 49 entries with "Tags: patch" on them, including
> one of my own.
> If the current dpkg cabal doesn't have enough resources to process even
> patched issues, perhaps it ought to take in some new members?
> (Not that I'm claiming to be qualified, though.)
Well, that's not going to be you.
You did *not* follow procedure.
If you want to help, start pseudo-tagging the bugs. If you don't know what I
mean, you'e even less qualified to work on dpkg.