"Julian Mehnle" <lists@mehnle.net> writes: > According to bug #227844[1], CAN-2004-0057 (which *has* been fixed) is "a > different vulnerability than CAN-2003-0989". So, as far as I can see, > CAN-2003-0989 has not been fixed yet, has it? It has; CAN-2003-0989 isn't mentioned in the bug log, but the package I uploaded to unstable contains fixes for both problems. I probably should have mentioned this in the changelog entry, sorry. -- ,''`. : :' : Romain Francoise <rfrancoise@debian.org> `. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/ `-
Attachment:
pgpedEGvBm_VF.pgp
Description: PGP signature