Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 10:57:34PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> So why is Eagle a large i386-only package with i386 binaries in
> /usr/share? This is ridiculous - surely that's a bug in and of itself!
I have absolutely no idea; that's only the first single-arch package I
could spot in your list.
There are other ones, if you want to give them a look: clue, cmix,
digikam, etherboot, fenris, freefem3d, gibraltar-bootcd, gnat-gdb,
mindi, nasm, powermanga, squid, wine-doc, xffm4, ebook-dev-kde20,
ipadic, parmedis, pdp11-unix-v6 and pdp11-unix-v7.
(This list was made by hand by looking for source package names that
appeared only ones. There certainly are some false-positives, ans some
of those package probably deserve bug reports...)