[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: taking over elm-me+

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:57:37AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Martin Michlmayr 
> | To be honest, after reading this thread, I'm leaning towards just
> | removing elm-me+.  If your wife really wants to continue using it, you
> | can just keep the old .deb around.  I switched to Mutt in 1996, so I
> | didn't follow elm-me*, but I thought it had been dead for quite a
> | while, so keeping it in Debian probably doesn't make much sense.
> elm-me+ has /usr/bin/frm, though; is there some replacement for that
> functionality?

The next release of lsmbox will likely contain frm functionality.

Regards: David Weinehall
 /) David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /) Northern lights wander      (\
//  Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel   //  Dance across the winter sky //
\)  http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/    (/   Full colour fire           (/

Reply to: