Re: taking over elm-me+
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:57:37AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Martin Michlmayr
> | To be honest, after reading this thread, I'm leaning towards just
> | removing elm-me+. If your wife really wants to continue using it, you
> | can just keep the old .deb around. I switched to Mutt in 1996, so I
> | didn't follow elm-me*, but I thought it had been dead for quite a
> | while, so keeping it in Debian probably doesn't make much sense.
> elm-me+ has /usr/bin/frm, though; is there some replacement for that
The next release of lsmbox will likely contain frm functionality.
Regards: David Weinehall
/) David Weinehall <firstname.lastname@example.org> /) Northern lights wander (\
// Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky //
\) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Full colour fire (/