[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)

On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 18:30, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 12:34:08PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > So what, in your opinion, are the technologies (or significant packages)
> > > which should be in Debian but are not? And why do you think they are
> > > not?
> > 
> > Subversion. It's currently deliberately held out of sarge[1] by an RC
> > report[2], Branden Robinson requests violation of policy (adding
> > debugging symbols) for it is alpha quality. However, this is no longer
> > true[3], and next month 1.0 will be released[4]. They have a very
> > precise schedule, and tend to stick to it.
> > 
> As I understand it, Subversion 0.37.0-1, uploaded to unstable yesterday,
> should be able to get into testing.
Sadly not.

0.37.0-2, which might actually contain all of the files necessary to
build it could though


Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: