Re: Experimental packages not being aged properly?
Josip Rodin <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 05:26:06PM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
>> Section 220.127.116.11 of the developer's reference says:
>> the experimental packages are automatically removed once you upload
>> the package in unstable with a higher version number.
>> But a p.d.o search on the libldap2 package shows that both testing and
>> unstable have higher version numbers (2.1.23-1) than the experimental
>> package (2.1.12-1). The experimental package is still there.
> File a bug on the developer's reference, that's probably out of date by
> several years, if if wasn't incorrect when it was first added...
No, it's correct, the problem is the script which detects these things
works on source packages and:
openldap2 | 2.1.23-1 | unstable | source
openldap2.1 | 2.1.12-1 | experimental | source
I've added extending the check to binary packages to the TODO list,
until it's done, feel free to file bugs about any other packages like
this which get missed.