Re: 185 Packages that look orphaned
Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
> I looked through the differences between testing and unstable and
> picked out everything older than 100 days. Reasons why those packages
> are not in testing are:
>
> - non-free / contrib packages nobody tried to compile
> - FTBFS or RC bugs
> - possibly failure of the testing script to detect it
> - other packages hold you back (get involved in those other packages)
[...]
> w3-el
w3-el was supposed to be removed from unstable. Anyone know why
it's still showing up in the Sources.gz for unstable?
--
Ben Pfaff
email: blp@cs.stanford.edu
web: http://benpfaff.org
Reply to: