Re: w3m -> standard, lynx -> optional

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: dickey@saltmine.radix.net
Subject: Re: w3m -> standard, lynx -> optional
From: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:45:55 +0900 (JST)
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040124.214555.-432839764.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1012assm581au05@corp.supernews.com>
References: <200401231120.i0NBKfDI012251@saltmine.radix.net> <[🔎] 20040123133829.GA1580@balrog.logic.univie.ac.at> <[🔎] 1012assm581au05@corp.supernews.com>

From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@saltmine.radix.net>
Subject: Re: w3m -> standard, lynx -> optional
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:11:40 -0000

> That's an apples & oranges comparison, btw.  I see that lynx-cur (which
> is what you should have cited) is built with ncurses rather than ncursesw
> (a problem for this comparison).

So I just uploaded lynx-cur 2.8.5-17 compiled with ncursesw.

> lynx can, if it is packaged properly.  For more than a year (2.8.5dev.7).

I hope lynx-cur was packaged properly but if you noticed
any problem please let me know.

Thanks for your help.

Regards,			2004-1-24(Sat)

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
 Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: w3m -> standard, lynx -> optional
  - From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@saltmine.radix.net>

References:
- Re: w3m -> standard, lynx -> optional
  - From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@logic.univie.ac.at>
- Re: w3m -> standard, lynx -> optional
  - From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@saltmine.radix.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Soliciting "I need these everywhere I go" package lists from Debian admins
Next by Date: Re: Non-free package licenses and replacements
Previous by thread: Re: w3m -> standard, lynx -> optional
Next by thread: Re: w3m -> standard, lynx -> optional
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread