Re: The stable/testing/unstable branches not a solution ?
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 09:53:16AM -0600,
Joel Konkle-Parker <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote
a message of 58 lines which said:
> I would do it differently. What about the following:
> unstable base unstable add-ons
Just a reminder: Debian is not the only free OS. Every proposal for
Debian should be, IMHO, backed by a serious analysis of the free OS
that already implemented this proposal and the issues it raised.
For instance, FreeBSD has a small base and many "add-ons" (called
"ports") and it makes a lot of interesting problems too (such as the
religious and never-ending debate, "Should Perl be in base?").