[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)

On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:39:34PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> For PaX to be considered we need someone to maintain a kernel-patch-pax 
> package that contains a patch which applies to a Debian kernel source.  
> No-one has been willing to do this so far.

Emm.. Excuse me? And what do the kernel-patch-adamantix packages do? 
Granted, it's not only PaX, but PaX+RSBAC+XFS+AES loop+LVS+other stuff, but 
still, it _does_ include PaX.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: