Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)

To: "debian-devel@lists.debian.org" <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
From: "Matthew A. Nicholson" <webmaster@matt-land.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:29:31 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] opr1rz7hme7tj8uv@localhost>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040111195339.GI15281@erizo.shearer.org>
References: <[🔎] 20040111195339.GI15281@erizo.shearer.org>

On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 06:23:39 +1030, Dan Shearer <dan@shearer.org> wrote:

Since my Deb Miniconf3 topic was chosen by poll (Jonathan Oxer :-) I
thought I might as well get some input on the content too.

So what, in your opinion, are the technologies (or significant packages)
which should be in Debian but are not? And why do you think they are
not?

To the list or, if you prefer lower temperatures, private email. The
slides will be made available, and a post made here.

Some of this stuff should be given to the debian-desktop project (prettierboot, java browser plugins, flash, themes...). Then they will havesomething to do.



--
Matthew A. Nicholson
Matt-Land.com

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>

References:
- Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Dan Shearer <dan@shearer.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [multiarch] Proposal for *-dev packages
Next by Date: Anjuta IDE segfault on preferences menu
Previous by thread: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Next by thread: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread