Re: Bug#227017: ITP: mixxx -- Digital Disk Jockey (DDJ) interface
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:37:20PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> How many times has to be said that the description in the ITP is not
> necesarily the one which will end in the package itself?
Why not? Seems like as good a place as any to put your "first draft" for
comment and improvement. Certainly less friction to make comments on
descriptions now, before a package has gone up, than to get the bugs flying
5 minutes after upload because your description is full of typos and
mistakes.
- Matt
Reply to: