Re: And next name after Sarge? or PROPOSAL for Codenames' election

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: And next name after Sarge? or PROPOSAL for Codenames' election
From: Nano Nano <40101.nospam@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:05:25 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040109080525.GA3728@comcast.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040109060942.GA5736@neuffer.info>
References: <[🔎] 200401071709.59178.DXpublica@telefonica.net> <[🔎] 20040107222634.GA22281@dat.etsit.upm.es> <[🔎] 20040109060942.GA5736@neuffer.info>

On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 07:09:43AM +0100, Michael Neuffer wrote:
> >     104     - Stinky Pete the Prospector (the old fat guy)
> 
> We used Potato already.

Please call it stinky -- that would be so righteous.

Reply to:

References:
- And next name after Sarge? or PROPOSAL for Codenames' election
  - From: Xan <DXpublica@telefonica.net>
- Re: And next name after Sarge? or PROPOSAL for Codenames' election
  - From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
- Re: And next name after Sarge? or PROPOSAL for Codenames' election
  - From: Michael Neuffer <neuffer@neuffer.info>

Prev by Date: dupload question
Next by Date: Re: udev and /sys mounting [was: mounting tmpfs (and sysfs) defaultly in sarge?]
Previous by thread: Re: And next name after Sarge? or PROPOSAL for Codenames' election
Next by thread: Re: And next name after Sarge? or PROPOSAL for Codenames' election
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread