Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk system call

To: Debian Devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>, Patrick Ouellette <pouelle@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk system call
From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:50:01 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 95F43D32-2A4E-11D8-BA00-00039317863E@suespammers.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] EHEOIEJMBFBKCKMPHFJKAECBELAA.lists@mehnle.net>
References: <[🔎] EHEOIEJMBFBKCKMPHFJKAECBELAA.lists@mehnle.net>


On Dec 8, 2003, at 07:14, Julian Mehnle wrote:

Apart from that, as soon as the use of IPv6 broadens, dynamicallyassigned IP addresses will diminish.

Stateless autoconfig + privacy extensions means quite the opposite islikely to occur.

Reply to:

References:
- RE: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk system call
  - From: "Julian Mehnle" <lists@mehnle.net>

Prev by Date: Re: http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/
Next by Date: Re: Building Debian Completely From Source
Previous by thread: RE: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk system call
Next by thread: Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk system call
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread