On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 08:49:25PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote: > On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 18:06, Richard Braakman wrote: > > > > It's::not::like::this::sort::of::jargon::is::difficult::to::understand,::or > > > > ::that::writing::package::descriptions::which::rely::entirely::on::one's > > > > ::understanding of::what::other::packages::do::is::uncommon. > > > > > > I really hope you used sed or some workalike to accomplish that. > > > > "workalike"? sed is a workalike for the real editor. > > > > :%s/ /::/g > > For some reason, I had it in my mind that Branden used emacs, which > spawned the 'workalike' comment. I have no evidence to back that up, > though. > > Emacs would be a good editor for the Overfiend, though. I think he uses vim. Check the comments in some of the X scripts at least: $ tail -n1 /etc/X11/Xsession # vim:ai:et:sts=2:sw=2:tw=80: -- gram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature