On Sunday 05 October 2003 16:22, Mathieu Roy wrote: > KDE in the description makes more sense, IMHO, than Qt. The same goes > gtk+ and GNOME. Agree. > A user should know which enviromnent he picked -- while he may totally > ignore that KDE is using Qt, for instance. > > Descriptions should only care, I think, about full desktop environment, > not toolkit -- defined GUI style instead of libraries. If a software > is only GTK+, not _for_ GNOME, there are many reasons to believe that > this software does not follow the "tremendous" UI of GNOME. This is probably the best way i think. This sames to be the best compromise between having enough information without being over zealous in description. Tom
Attachment:
pgpKgKGszRYCs.pgp
Description: signature