Wouter Verhelst wrote: > The way this garbage collection is implemented is one of the main > dislikes I have about aptitude. Aptitude contains a database with > packages that have been installed through aptitude; as such, it contains > no information on packages that were installed through a different > dpkg-frontend. Which is no problem in itself, except that aptitude > assumes a package which has not been installed through aptitude is not > wanted; this makes a transition from a different dpkg-frontend to > aptitude cumbersome, to say the least. I don't know if this might be a bug that has crept in at some point, but when I first used aptitude, it assumed that everyone on my machine was _not_ to be automatically removed. Which seems like the right default. Craig
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature