[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Done (was Re: [mass bug filing?] Short descriptions being used as long descriptions and other policy violations)



On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 10:24:39AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña (jfs@computer.org):
> 
> > Well, I'm doing so right now, I will start from the first bug file until 
> > the last one and either provide what might be, IMHO, a better description 
> > or close them if they were filed incorrectly. I sure have a lot of work to 
> > do now ammending (sp?) for my mistakes.
> 
> For 764 bugs ?

Well, 734 really.

> 
> Well, I know spanish people like to live late, but prepare to spend
> the next weeks on this.... :-)

Probably more than that, based on the time it took me to send patches for 
the first packages (more than a few minutes, more like 5-10 minutes per 
package [0]) I expect to be doing this for more than a month (so if your 
begins with 'x' don't expect a patch sooner than that :-(

Friendly

Javi

[0] Going through the package documentation (if available), browsing in
Google for the appropiate program (trying to find a homepage of sorts),
writing a description in my awkward English, and submitting the mails took,
more or less, that long.

Curiously enough, while googling I've found some pretty good descriptions
in the ports tree of some of the BSD distributions.

Attachment: pgpc20CClI93m.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: