Re: Snort: Mass Bug Closing
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Snort: Mass Bug Closing
- From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@raw.no>
- Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 08:15:44 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87bru33ecv.fsf@yiwaz.raw.no>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20030825012741.GA18980@uk.intasys.com> (Steve Kemp's message of "Mon, 25 Aug 2003 02:27:41 +0100")
- References: <20030824135745.GJ15732@freshdot.net> <20030824145906.GR23336@cerberus> <20030824233210.GR1904@morgul.net> <87smnq4omm.fsf@mrvn.homelinux.org> <20030825012741.GA18980@uk.intasys.com>
* Steve Kemp
| (Essentially apt-get + apt-cache for snort rules. Clearly packaging a
| single rule file within one package is a gross misuse of resources but
| it might be sufficient if they were signed and hosted somewhere
| sensible..)
They could all be packaged into a single package (or a small number of
them, if that makes sense) and just have the frontend enable/disable
the rules.
--
Tollef Fog Heen ,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
`. `'
`-
Reply to: