Re: debian archive disk space requirements.
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: debian archive disk space requirements.
- From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 20:35:25 +1000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20030901103525.GA9760@cloud.net.au>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <87znhpq4uq.fsf@mrvn.homelinux.org>
- References: <20030606090034.GA15495@daedalus.andrew.net.au> <20030606135348.GC15071@prvidomaci.srce.hr> <20030607003824.GA14627@daedalus.andrew.net.au> <20030607183328.GA16088@prvidomaci.srce.hr> <20030607233157.GA7432@snoopy.apana.org.au> <20030608101238.GB589@prvidomaci.srce.hr> <Pine.GSO.4.50.0308301136460.12344-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com> <20030830101850.GD27871@prvidomaci.srce.hr> <20030830174147.GA10739@informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> <87znhpq4uq.fsf@mrvn.homelinux.org>
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 04:27:57PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> "Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@debian.org> writes:
> [resorted by size]
> > architecture | size
> > --------------+------------
> > i386 | 3378532922
> > ia64 | 3394287226
> And people allways say that 64 Bit archs need much bigger executables.
And ia64 was the biggest on the list, despite having 600 fewer packages
than i386 according to Marcelo's followup post. So what was your point
Goswin?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Reply to: