On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 11:54:54PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote: > "Categories" is bad imho, because it's not intuitive that a package has > many categories it does fit in. > Maybe we should really use the term "aspect". or "characteristics"? Or keep staying generic and try "stamp" or "mark". Tag was a name for a generic label attached to the package: a name good enough until we will get a better understanding of them. I personally like "aspect", but I wouldn't be able to say why. I still think we could stick with a generic "tag" until we gain more insight about them. Yours truly, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <enrico@debian.org>
Attachment:
pgpvM660lDjcJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature