On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 05:21:59PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> You'll make m68k unusable with this migration at this time. binutils
> is broken, gcc-3.2 doesn't build and the outdated version for m68k
> generates wrong code for at least bash and coreutils above -O0. Go
> ahead and remove m68k from the architectures which will be releasable
> for sarge.
> - The binutils testsuite currently fails 46 out of 99 tests. One
> grave bug report is outstanding. I'm currently down to 10 failures,
> but there should be 0.
> - gcc-3.2 doesn't bootstrap since December. In unstable, bootstrapping
> in woody does work.
binutils and gcc-3.2 aren't going in yet.
> - bash and coreutils are miscompiled at -O1 and above. These are known
> failures. How many are unknown?
coreutils isn't going in yet, bash is.
> I don't know, which versions of the above packages will be moved to
> testing. So my arguments may be invalid against the migration of m68k
> packages to testing (but I didn't read about m68k exceptions in your
> announcement).
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations --
you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Attachment:
pgp5wi4p7PkLd.pgp
Description: PGP signature