On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:59:37PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Anthony Towns wrote: > > * What other major release goals are still possible at this point? > > I hope that rebuilding all the C++ stuff with gcc 3.2 is still on the > table for release too. > > I hope that as many packages as possible can just be rebuilt with gcc > 3.0 just cause it's better, but since we have no way to track what has > built with what generally, who knows. why gcc 3.0, and not 3.2? -- gram
Attachment:
pgp4nHKIxxGHf.pgp
Description: PGP signature