On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 01:23:27AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > I took my time to look up on what is pending in the C++ transition, > and I've noticed that most packages are still waiting > for libqt3 to go over to new ABI, > and libqt3 is still waiting over X, Not for much longer. There was only a minor problem with the build of 4.2.1-5 I tested this morning. > and X is confused with usage of virtual package name "libgl1". Confused how? > I received an impression that maybe "libgl1" virtual packaage may need > to be dropped in favor of something like "libgl1c102", but I have not > investigated enough to see if that is really necessary or desirable. I'm happy to do this if need be, but for this to work, all maintainers of libGL*-providing packages need to coordinate. -- G. Branden Robinson | I suspect Linus wrote that in a Debian GNU/Linux | complicated way only to be able to branden@debian.org | have that comment in there. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Lars Wirzenius
Attachment:
pgplS7tkEn7lT.pgp
Description: PGP signature