Bug#183860: RMS's comment on this bug is mostly irrelevant. :-/
Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> writes:
> Why do those who claim there is a copyright problem have to prove a
> negative? Shouldn't it be the responsibility of those who claim their
> is no problem to show examples that undermine the claim that DVI output
> is a derivative work of texinfo.tex?
It looks like the issue may now become irrelevant. Upstream texinfo just
added the following:
% As a special exception, when this file is read by TeX when processing
% a Texinfo source document, you may use the result without
% restriction. (This has been our intent since Texinfo was invented.)
--
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: