[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: apt 0.6 in experimental

Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Perhaps you should check the actual URL that apt is attempting to retrieve,
> and make sure that you are placing the Release file in the correct place?
> apt-get --print-uris update works as expected.

'http://kitenet.net/~joey/debian/dists/unstable//Release.gpg' kitenet.net_%7ejoey_debian_dists_unstable__Release.gpg 0 

The problem with that url is that the sources.list entry is this:

deb http://kitenet.net/~joey/debian/ unstable/

And the actual url, http://kitenet.net/~joey/debian/unstable. No
"dists". Does it still not support two-part sources.list entries
properly? I seem to remember something in the apt-secure docs about this

This is gonna be kind of annoying if it gets out of experimental before
this is fixed.

see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: