[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits from the RM

Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:38:10AM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote on debian-devel-announce:
> > 
> > >                                               I think the best way is to
> > > file a RFA (which we're redefining as "Request For Assistance" instead
> > > of just "Request For Adoption") report against wnpp
> > [cut]
> > > Third, personnel deployment. As a complement to the "Request For
> > > Assistance" stuff, we're also creating a new wnpp heading, OTA for
> > > "Offer To Assist".
> > 
> > Will http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ be modified to reflect these new
> > tags?  (When it's official I'll modify debian-bug.el)
> It is simple to do this and I also offered to do it for another proposal
> one day before the compromise. When I regain CVS access I can/will take 
> care of it.


Anyone know the answer to my second question?

: Does the OTA bug get filled against the package you are offering to help
: with, or against wnpp?  I presume against the package you are offering
: to help with, but then there's no easy way to see where help is offered
: overall.

Reply to: