Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk system call
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 08:30:55 +0100, Bernd Eckenfels <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> Hehe, well I am sorry. I had the impression 2.4.23 was older. Should
> have checked my facts.
> BTW: I do have checked the kernel version of the major distros, all
> ship newer kernels than debian (if you look at the upstream
> version). However I do not know how reliable dostrowatch is, for
Really? Prove it. Or is this "fact" like your other facts?
Maintainer: Herbert Xu <email@example.com>
Provides: kernel-image, kernel-image-2.6
Depends: initrd-tools (>= 0.1.53), coreutils | fileutils (>= 4.0), module-init-tools (>= 0.9.13)
Suggests: lilo (>= 19.1), fdutils, kernel-doc-2.6.0-test9
Description: Linux kernel image for version 2.6.0-test9 on 386.
This package contains the Linux kernel image for version 2.6.0-test9 on
the corresponding System.map file, and the modules built by the packager.
It also contains scripts that try to ensure that the system is not left in
a unbootable state after an update.
If you wish to update a bootdisk, or to use a bootloader to make
installing and using the image easier, we suggest you install the latest
fdutils (for formatting a floppy to be used as boot disk), and LILO, for a
powerful bootloader. Of course, both these are optional.
Kernel image packages are generally produced using kernel-package,
and it is suggested that you install that package if you wish to
create a custom kernel from the sources.
It is bad luck to be superstitious. Andrew W. Mathis
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C