Re: apt-rpm article -- the features we don't have
Maybe I'm missing something, but none of this sounds like
functionality that a bit of parsing out to other programs can't
solve, given that I do it locally for the systems in my lab.
Joey Hess <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Interesting article on LWN: http://lwn.net/Articles/60650/ (subscription
> required) In summary, apparently apt-rpm users can now do some things
> with apt that we cannot.
> To install a package directly, with apt downloading any necessary
> apt-get install rpmver-2.0-13498cl.i386.rpm
couldn't this just refer to dpkg --install ?
> Similarly, to check the build depends of a source package file:
> apt-get build-dep apt-listchanges-1.49-11104cl.src.rpm
> Next is a bit about local repositories that work w/o a Packages file.
> Instead of needing to keep the Packages file up-to-date, apt just scans
> the rpm files in the local repository directory. Of course this needs a
> file:// repository. Sounds just a smidgen easier than using
if there is a directory, a temporary run of dpkg-scanpackages plus...?
> There is something vague about improvements in the "upgrading
> algorythm" that may or may not apply to us.
> There is a bit about an apt shell which sounds mildly interesting.
> The rest of the new features seem more applicable to rpm than to deb.
> At least the first three things I've mentioned above would be nice
> features to have in debian. Not killer, but nice. Of course apt-rpm is a
> branch/fork from out apt, so I wonder how long it will be before we do..
> see shy jo
Biomedical and Health Informatics University of Washington
Biostatistics, SCHARP/HVTN Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
UW (Tu/Th/F): 206-616-7630 FAX=206-543-3461 | Voicemail is unreliable
FHCRC (M/W): 206-667-7025 FAX=206-667-4812 | use Email
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments may be
confidential and privileged. If you received this message in error,
please destroy it and notify the sender. Thank you.