Re: Debian IS for the enterprise (Was: Debian Enterprise?)
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Debian IS for the enterprise (Was: Debian Enterprise?)
- From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
- Date: 01 Dec 2003 08:59:29 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 8765h0ud5a.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net>
- In-reply-to: <20031130195345.B59423@bolthole.com>
- References: <pan.2003.11.17.06.45.04.855800@voxel.net> <200311262229.10787.russell@coker.com.au> <87brqz87az.fsf@papadoc.bayour.com> <200311271122.46192.russell@coker.com.au> <20031130195345.B59423@bolthole.com>
Scripsit Philip Brown <phil@bolthole.com>
> postfix is a clearly recognized leading mail program
> KDE is a clearly recognized leading desktop system
> Neither one would realistically be targetted for removal.
> It's all the miscellaneous also-ran junk that would be targetted, I would
> guess.
But which "miscellaneous also-ran junk" is actually holding up the
release? As far as I understand, what you speak of is the packages
where the release manager's policy should *already* be "drop from
testing rather than wait for RC bugs to be fixed".
The subset of the "miscellaneous also-ran junk" that is not actually
buggy in testing will not harm anyone by being distributed.
--
Henning Makholm "I have seen men with a *fraction* of
your trauma pray to their deity for death's
release. And when death doesn't arrive immediately,
they reject their deity and begin to beg to another."
Reply to: