Joe Drew wrote: > On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 11:41, Thomas Viehmann wrote: >>I guess when originally preparing descriptions I thought of the short >>description as something similar to a headline. I'd hate to bug any of >>my sponsors just to fix that, but if you absolutely care, I'd put up the >>packages with my new descriptions immediately. > IMO this is something to be added in the changes for the next version to > be uploaded, but it alone does not warrant an upload. Well, if I thought it was very urgent, I would not have waited until someone complains. On the other hand that's basically what's left to fix the packages properly (one downgrade of the priority of a -dev library from optional to extra has also been made and one "reload" added to an init script), so it might be considered getting things really shiny for an eventual release: One crappy description doesn't stick out that much, but as little as 10% or 5% really make an impact on the impression a user gets. Cheers T.
Attachment:
pgpfkuxQc7lRP.pgp
Description: PGP signature