[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?



On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 05:59:33PM +0000, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 12:04:00PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> > Andrew Lau wrote:
> > > So is vrms now up for a name change before the real RMS decides to sue
> > > us for misrepresenting him! = ) 
> > > Nominations are now open.
> > debian-legalint
> I think this one, or a variation, has good prospects..

If it's just going to check freeness, maybe "dfsg-check" or something?

Something called "legalint" really ought to let you check that you're
using non-free stuff legitimately rather than just complaining that you're
using it at all -- checking number of concurrent users, or concurrent
installs, or that you're non-commercial, or that your licenses are up
to date, or whatever else.

Though that'd be kinda cool too.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

Australian DMCA (the Digital Agenda Amendments) Under Review!
	-- http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/copyright/digitalagenda

Attachment: pgpkbH9ny2Eqb.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: