Re: MIPS port backlog, autobuilder machines and some arrogance
In article <SQZL.2pM.email@example.com> you wrote:
>> Not quite. Ingo is volunteering to provide a MIPS buildd, but since he's
>> not a Debian Developer, he can't handle its logs. Thus, he's asked me,
> Its intresting to note that Debian trusts several NMs and normal users
> to host and maintain their buildds (giving them access to silently
> backdoor every deb thats build there) but not enough to make them DDs.
Hmmm, well, to become a DD I would have to apply as a DD, right? And that´s
what I´m trying to avoid for some certain reasons.
Regarding the backdoor issue... you have not the guarantee that even
certified DDs don´t do this, as well as I don´t have a guarantee that the
developers that have an account on that machine don´t do something harmfull
with that... ;))