Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 02:14:53PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> I don't know whether to file a bug report or just laugh my head off.
> netsnipe@espresso:~% vrms
> Non-free packages installed on espresso
> doc-linux-nonfree-text Linux HOWTOs in ASCII format (non-free)
> doc-rfc-std Standard RFCs
> Now we all know Richard M. Stallman's position on the GFDL, but I find
> it extremely ironic that his virtual persona in Debian now discriminates
> against his packages which uses a license his real self would approve.
> So is vrms now up for a name change before the real RMS decides to sue
> us for misrepresenting him! = )
> Nominations are now open.
I was kind of happy when I saw the Ian or somebody (the original guy)
suggest spinning off non-free.
Nothing better than redfining a problem not to exist.