[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gimp1.2: gimp package suggest non-free software

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote:

> 	The fact that the tool authors have not seen fit to implement
>  some functionality has nothing to do with policy (despite what you
>  may think, policy is not dpkg documentation).

Policy is also not something that should document something that isn't
implemented(by your own admission).

And people reading fields is not a valid counter-argument.  People can read
*any* field, so you could argue that policy can document *any* field.

Reply to: