Re: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel
I think you haven't read my previous mail:
Please have a look at it, my response below assumes you did.
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 08:56:38AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> As an academic exercise this is fine and dandy, but having two
> competing packagings of the same _basic_ component can't do us any
This isn't a "competing" package. As I said before, the standard way Linux
kernel packaging is handled is "a good choice for the power user". I don't
intend to "replace" it or the like, just add more options for the people who
> If you have a problem with the way kernel packages are handled
> (upgrades in particular, which seems to be your problem), go talk with
> the official kernel image packages maintainer and work something out.
If I had a "problem" with some package, I'd use the BTS or speak with the
maintainer. This is not the case here. As explained before, my package
build-depends on "kernel-patch-debian" and uses the standard patchset in
that package. Rather than "duplicating work", it is "building on top of
When I announced it (previous mail), Herbert Xu was on CC. He's the maintainer
of "kernel-patch-debian" which does the real work for this package. My package
is simply an extension for Herbert's work. I don't know wether he's interested
or not in this extension, but I do obviously welcome his participation.
> This creates _more_ work for everybody.
Who is "everybody" (asides Linux kernel module maintainers)?
> What do you want to do with
> binaries of kernel modules? Have more duplication of effort?
That's up to the module maintainers. Adding support for the Linux kernel when
packaged as a standard Debian package is easy for them, since in packaging
terms it's not much different than linking your package against a library.
Certainly, if they choose to "duplicate effort" and support both alternatives,
that will prove me right in the fact that both of them are interesting for the
"[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the
thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he
gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work."
-- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion)