Re: Accepted vile 9.4-c1 (powerpc sparc i386 source all)
In article <PbSS.38C.firstname.lastname@example.org> you wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 20:04:54 +1100
> Source: vile
> Binary: xvile vile-filters vile vile-common
> Architecture: all i386 powerpc source sparc
> Version: 9.4-c1
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Brendan O'Dea <email@example.com>
> Changed-By: Brendan O'Dea <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> vile - VI Like Emacs - vi work-alike
> vile-filters - VI Like Emacs - highlighting filters for vile/xvile
> xvile - VI Like Emacs - vi work-alike (X11)
> vile (9.4-c1) unstable; urgency=low
oh - my first reaction was startled that it didn't say "9.4c".
> * New upstream patch version.
> * Build filters as shared objects rather than executables.
I ran some tests seeing if I could use the same filters between vile/xvile,
and (surprisingly) it does seem to work. That might simplify packaging.
> * Change build depends to specify flex-old due to problems with new
I did notice that (and have noticed new-flex upstream hasn't done anything
Thomas E. Dickey