The difference between proposals A and C wasn't clear to me at first, so at Manoj's request, I am sharing it with everyone. If you read carefully, you won't need this, I guess. > Proposal A: Clarifies status of non-technical documents. Creates > Foundation Documents class which requires 3:1 majority to change and > includes the Social Contract and the DFSG. > > [...] > > + 5.2 The Foundation Documents are the works entitled "Debian > + Social Contract" and "Debian Free Software Guidelines". [...] > Proposal C: Clarifies status of non-technical documents. Creates > Foundation Documents class which requires 3:1 majority to change and > includes _only_ the Social Contract, and *not* the DFSG. > > [...] > > + 5.2 The Foundation Document is the work entitled "Debian > + Social Contract". As you can see, the only difference is that proposal A calls the Social Contract *and* the DFSG a foundation document in section 5.2. Proposal C only calls the social contract a foundation document. Hope this clears it up for some. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Attachment:
pgpV5N2XUaxCE.pgp
Description: PGP signature