Re: XMMS doesn't like itself much...
"Aaron M. Ucko" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Matt Bonner <email@example.com> writes:
> > Thanks! I was wondering if it wouldn't have been clearer to say
> > that XMMS 1.2.8 Provides alsa-xmms instead of saying alsa-xmms
> > Conflicts with xmms. Any thoughts?
> xmms both provides and conflicts (with) alsa-xmms; dselect just only
> chooses to mention the latter relationship, at least on that screen.
> I agree that its interface could be better, and personally favor
> aptitude; however, it doesn't have explicit conflict-resolution
> screens at all.
Amazing. dselect managed to mention 4 relationships, but not that one.
"There has to be a beter way..."
thanks for explaining,
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search