also sprach Russell Coker <email@example.com> [2003.09.21.1607 +0200]: > I think that we should include some improvements to the default > kernel by default. The question is not whether we should > distribute modified kernels but how modified they should be. Yes, I agree. > and maybe we can include the Red Hat kernel in Debian and have > patches against it too. Consider yourself slapped. The last time I took a look at the Red Hat kernel, it seemed as if it was the patchy type of feature-everything-at-cost-of-security-and-manageability > > I don't buy a book just to find that every third page is > > different. A note "we thought you might want the changed pages. > > if you don't, please remove them and put the loose ones in the > > package into their place" doesn't help that. > > Bad analogy. Consider the way that the Harry Potter books have > been modified for the limited vocabulary of the American audience. I don't know those, nor am I particularly interested. But do you think that if the American audience would have known about this, would they have just accepted it? I think the analogy is not too bad. It's also not good. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: PGP signature