Re: lastest security reports and testing (sarge)
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 12:26:05PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> But I might be missing something, so please explain why autobuilding
> against testing is a bad thing IYHO... :) Usually, the counter-argument is
> something like "the libs in unstable end up being less tested", which has
> never quite convinced me, because obviously people running unstable will
> be running packages built against testing, but *under unstable*, using the
> newer unstable libs.
In order for this to work, you would need to be able to check that the
package built against testing is also installable on unstable. This is not
always true.
--
- mdz
Reply to: